Here is a gripping report from this week’s ‘Adweek’ (based in New York) about the new marketing strategies being used by pharmaceutical companies.
Don’t be put off by the reference to ‘Obamacare.’ The story is equally applicable to the United Kingdom. For it is essentially a tale about how disease is being re-packaged. Patient data is the new currency, social and digital media the marketplace. Companies are no longer selling potions and pills but offering an all-round ‘service’ to patients and health professionals.
The speed with which the private sector can move in this way is dizzying (I thought I was doing well this morning by getting someone to agree some terms of reference!). The sums of money at their disposal, mind-boggling. In fact, the implications of what is happening can feel overwhelming. So much so that it is easy, all too easy, to put on one’s ‘Blockbuster’ voiceover just to up the threatening atmosphere. Yet who isn’t chilled to the bone when a commentator can glibly say in print:
‘For years Lilly has owned diabetes.’
Has anyone told people with diabetes and their families this?
I am sure that many patient advocates will be worried by the scale and speed by which these new approaches are heading our way. But we seem to be in a collective state of un-readiness for this latest chapter in the marketization of health or selling sickness. Or are we just complicit? Either way it makes the work of organisations such as ‘Selling Sickness’ or Sense about Science as well as advocates such as Margaret McCartney who are calling attention to these trends, all the more important.
How will patients be able to source independent advice when the market is smothered by ‘Trojan horse websites’ or apps backed by pharmaceutical companies? How will they be able to identify truths amidst this morass? Can regulators realistically be expected ‘protect and promote’ the public interest in the digital age using the same carrot and stick approaches that have failed in the past? We have barely begun to think through the consequences. Let alone the solutions. And yes, these have to involve the companies themselves.
The danger is that we continue with our obsessions about things like the best model for lay reviewing when such bigger changes are afoot; we can only stay entrenched in land wars about whether something is public involvement versus participation versus engagement for so long surely? Let’s not allow ourselves to become so tamed within our own boundaries that we lose the art of thinking beyond them and tackling new challenges? Otherwise it will all be over when we finally do wake up.
In the meantime, we should remember, there’s no such thing as a free app….